The Cytotoxic Bolus Theory
A missing puzzle piece explaining a lot of the harm caused by covid vaccines?
The bolus theory is very convincing theory by Marc Girardot, which basically explains a lot of the cardiovascular adverse reactions from covid vaccines, such as cardiovascular diseases, myocarditis, sudden adult death syndrome, thrombosis etc. may mainly be caused by inadvertent intravascular injection of the mRNA covid vaccines. The spike protein theory has been excessively focused on as the main culprit of adverse events from the covid vaccines, but the bolus theory, in concert with the the cytotoxic lipid nanoparticles, and the spike protein together are compatible and it helps piecing together the puzzle, thus revealing a larger story.
A brief explanation of the bolus theory
Marc explains his theory in brief in a substack post which he wrote after Bret Weinstein mentioned it on The Joe Rogan Experience. I quoted essential information from his theory below.
1. Accidental intravascular injections in a hospital setting are real, material and proven by several studies. Experienced Nurses Hit the Vascular System in 1,5-2% of Injections according to a 2015 Study, despite aspiration
2. Injecting these vaccines intravascularly causes similar adverse effects to the ones in pharmaco-vigilance databases. Several experiments with LNP:s on mice - even without a Bolus - have demonstrated that very clearly.
3. Finally, a Bolus would only make it much worse, because there’s an enormous difference in concentrations - very short lived - between an intramuscular injection trickling slowly in to the blood stream and a direct IV injection. The probability of vaccine uptake by the endothelial wall can be as high as 4,000 times higher.
Say the direct IV injection of a dose of Pfizer is diluted by 30 by the time it gets to the aorta, you’d have around 10,000 lipid nanoparticles hitting each square millimeter of endothelium6 during the very brief passage of the bolus. Let’s imagine 10% of these vaccine particles penetrate a cell when they hit it7, that means that up to a 1,000 cells will end up destroyed by the immune system, that’s more than 100% of the cells in that area! Likely irreparable, similar to a third degree burn.
In the case of a proper intramuscular injection, the maximum concentration would be 25 lipid nanoparticles presenting themselves to the same 1 sq.mm. of endothelial surface. Only 3 would be uptaken, or less 0.4% of the surface would end up destroyed. Those 3 cell gaps would be fixed within minutes of the immune attack. And life would go on.
This brief physical phenomenon, similar to an avalanche crashing through your vascular system, is the cause of all the Adverse Effects we have witnessed these past 2 years, and that have occurred for decades…
Marc is stressing that his theory is, still just a theory. It needs to be independently studied, verified and proved with evidence. General treatment and guidelines injecting medicines intravenously, and use of transfecting vaccines in particular, might be fundamentally changed based on the findings, and may save human lives and suffering in the future.
Inadvertent intravenous injection of Lipid Nanoparticles (LNP:s) seems to be the main culprit, which spreads this cytotoxic material via the blood stream in dangerous concentrations all over the body, quickly causing damage in the endothelium, wherever it lands. It’s literally a form of russian roulette.
LNP:s and subsequently, mRNA is then leaking into organs, being transfected, and cells starts to create spike protein, which is also a foreign cytotoxic protein, that in turn triggers secondary damage over months, and years to come, including sequelae, auto-immune disorders, neurological disorders, amyloid formation etc.
I don’t think this about disproving one theory over another. They both has a common element; the lipid nanoparticle, which we already knew was cytotoxic from the scientific gene therapy literature. This newly added knowledge gives a clearer picture of what is going on. The role of intravenous injections, the use of lipid nanoparticles, persistent pseudo-mRNA, and the production of spike protein are perfectly compatible, and together, tells a larger story of all the adverse reactions and harm these products have caused over the years.
The question is, what’s causing more damage? That we won’t know until years to come. Because these products were never properly tested. They could never have been regarded as safe. And herein lies the real crime; mandating these experimental products onto billions of people, without assessing the harms with proper safety pharmacological protocols.
More on Marc’s theory
If you want a long-format of the bolus theory, please watch Marc’s appearance on John Campbells show.
A deeper dive of Marc’s theory can be found here.
Like my work?
Send me some bitcoin over Lightning network:
Lightning address: email@example.com
Download a #bitcoin Lightning capable wallet such as Wallet Of Satoshi, Muun Wallet, Blue Wallet or Breez. Follow the instructions. Top up with Bitcoin, and then, just scan the QR code below to send a donation.
Buy bitcoin with automatic DCA buys in Europe:
Use Ref: NAKADAI and get 0.5% discount in fees when buying BTC.
Follow me on social media:
Nostr NIP-5: firstname.lastname@example.org
Nostr nPub: npub1sqaxzwvh5fhgw9q3d7v658ucapvfeds3dcd2587fcwyesn7dnwuq